Why Would Anybody Run a Nitrogen/Methanol System?


“Hi Gord, Your recent post in the Monty about N2/Methanol vs. endo generated gas was quite interesting and got some really good feedback. Your comment about the cost per hour difference, where N2/methanol is 3-4 times more expensive seems about right. Your example calculation has it at 3.5 time the cost of endo generated atmosphere. With such a cost difference, clearly those who are using N2/methanol are doing so for a really good reason in order to justify such a premium.
What was not addressed in the article or any of the follow up comments is that the cost of the nitrogen component can be drastically reduced by using PSA generated N2 instead of bulk liquid N2. Your example calculation used $0.70 per CCF for the N2 cost from a bulk liquid source. With PSA generated N2 at the same purity as bulk liquid (about 99.998%) your N2 cost goes from $0.70 per CCF to $0.126 per CCF, reducing the overall cost of the 4500 SCFH N2/methanol atmosphere by about $10 per hour, a significant savings! South-Tek Systems have many PSA installations in the heat treating industry and their N2Gen systems have proven to be super reliable and the ROI’s are very attractive. In this case, the ROI on a machine capable of making 2000 SCFH at 99.998% purity is about 1.3 years. That’s an investment everyone using N2/methanol atmosphere should consider.”
Did you like this article? Click here to subscribe to The Monty.